San Francisco was hit by a violent storm yesterday night (November 7). It shattered the windows in my living room and turned it into a mini swimming pool. Fortunately, I wasn’t hit by flying glass and most of my stuff survived (almost) unscathed.
I have put up some pictures of the aftermath (the first two were actually during the storm about half an hour after the window shattered).
For your enjoyment, a 360° immersive panorama I took of the Louvre courtyard in 1998. As a Java-enabled browser required, I moved it to a page of its own so as not to slow down the loading of this page too much:
The Chinese government sends executed men’s families invoices for the cost of the bullet. Not to be outdone, the German secret service bills the people it is tapping…
I moved in August 2001. My entry in the white pages still points to my old address, both in the paper and online version. When I called Pac Bell’s customer service, it took 3 transfers and 45 minutes for them just to figure out what happened.
Apparently, it takes two or three billing cycles before the change of address percolates to the white pages database, and the online database is a mirror of the paper directory, i.e. updated only once a year in November.
In France, France Telecom guarantees three days between a change of address and its update in the online directory service. Apparently, in California, even 15 months is too much to ask for.
This leads to an average time of 9.7 months before updates (the seasonality of moves from US Bureau of the Census report SIPP P70-66 does not change this figure much). About 15.9% of the US population moves each year (source: Census report P20-531), and thus we can expect about 13% the addresses in the phone book to be incorrect.
Conclusion 1: batch processing is bad. Just say No.
Conclusion 2: don’t expect big, fat, happy, dumb and technologically challenged Baby Bells to lead the way into the broadband future…
Update (2002-12-19):
I learned yesterday that over half of California households have unlisted numbers. That figures…
I bought a 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G AF-S Zoom-Nikkor for my father. This lens is a “G” series lens, which means it does not have a manual aperture selection ring. Unfortunately, the only Nikon camera I have to test the lens against is a mechanical FM3A. I thought the lens would be usable, if only wide open, but it also lacks the mechanical exposure meter coupling ridge, which means it isn’t usable at all except maybe with a handheld meter.
One of Nikon’s main arguments was the compatibility in its lens line (unlike Canon who sacrificed compatibility when they replaced the manual-focus FD mount with the “fly-by-wire” EOS mount). Most newer Nikon bodies (including the $2100 D100) are no longer able to meter with manual-focus AI-S lenses (other than the 45mm f/2.8P), and now older Nikon bodies won’t be able to use newer lenses either.
The two worlds of Nikon manual-focus and autofocus systems will now inevitably diverge.
Update (2002-12-13):
Nikon recently announced they will be producing a new “DX” line of reduced-image-circle lenses specially designed to offer wideangle capabilities to APS-size sensor digital SLRs like the D100. The other shoe drops?